Peter A. Chalk
Impact in
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
- Small Animals top 10%
- Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases
Papers in
-
- Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling 4
- Biochemical and Molecular Research 3
-
- Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology 8
- Co-authors
- David J. Kelly (3 shared papers)Nicky J. Hughes (2 shared papers)Peter N. Lowe (4 shared papers)Christopher L. Clayton (2 shared papers)Darerca Owen (1 shared paper)Chris L. Clayton (1 shared paper)Andrew D. Roberts (2 shared papers)R.J. Miles (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Bacteriology (2 papers)The Journal of Antibiotics (1 paper)Biochemical Society Transactions (1 paper)Microbiology (1 paper)FEBS Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter A. Chalk
20 papers receiving 658 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Nutrition and Dietetics 105
- Small Animals 49
- Cell Biology 90
- Molecular Biology 348
- Surgery 219
Countries citing papers authored by Peter A. Chalk
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter A. Chalk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter A. Chalk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter A. Chalk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter A. Chalk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter A. Chalk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter A. Chalk. The network helps show where Peter A. Chalk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter A. Chalk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 120 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 104 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 98 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 51 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 40 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 33 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 27 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 15 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 2 |
About Peter A. Chalk
Peter A. Chalk is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Surgery, Physiology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (8 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (7 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (4 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (3 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (2 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (2 papers) and Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (105 citations), Small Animals (49 citations), Cell Biology (90 citations), Molecular Biology (348 citations) and Surgery (219 citations). Peter A. Chalk has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David J. Kelly, Nicky J. Hughes, Peter N. Lowe, Christopher L. Clayton, Darerca Owen, Chris L. Clayton, Andrew D. Roberts, R.J. Miles, Robert K. Poole and E. Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, The Journal of Antibiotics, Biochemical Society Transactions, Microbiology and FEBS Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.