Penny Prather

1.6k citations
17 papers · 985 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Penny Prather

17 papers receiving 926 citations

Peers

Penny Prather
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 598
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 386
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 170
  • Physiology 186
  • Language and Linguistics 62
Replace John C. Marshall with:
John C. Marshall United Kingdom
Anna Maria Chilosi Italy
Jean-Claude Gilhodes France
Zaizhu Han China
Paola Cipriani Italy
Rita Capasso Italy
Jiang Xu United States
Hong‐Yan Bi China
Jiyeon Lee United States
Analı́a Arévalo Brazil
Penny Prather relative to John C. Marshall United Kingdom John C. Marshall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
John C. Marshall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Penny Prather

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Penny Prather's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Penny Prather with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Penny Prather more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Penny Prather

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Penny Prather. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Penny Prather. The network helps show where Penny Prather may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Penny Prather, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Penny Prather Line = papers co-authored together Penny Prather links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2004163
2 1979153
3 199685
4 200283
5 199573
6 200272
7 199168
8 200562
9 200157
10 199854
11
Language, communication, and the right hemisphere.
199530
12 199125
13 198019
14 198217
15 198113
16 199410
17 19891

About Penny Prather

Penny Prather is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 985 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (10 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (9 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (2 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper), Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper), Polyomavirus and related diseases (1 paper) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (598 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (386 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (170 citations), Physiology (186 citations) and Language and Linguistics (62 citations). Penny Prather has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Swinney, Edgar Zurif, Petrus J. de Vries, Max Hirshkowitz, Tracy Love, Matthew B. Stern, Christine M. Lee, Hiram Brownell, Howard I. Hurtig and Lewis P. Shapiro. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Brain and Language, Neuropsychology, Memory & Cognition and European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact