Peng Ding

1.0k citations
52 papers · 782 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peng Ding

47 papers receiving 774 citations

Peers

Peng Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 206
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 455
  • General Engineering 19
  • Orthodontics 39
  • Building and Construction 86
Replace Zhiyi Huang with:
Zhiyi Huang China
Mohd Shahir Kasim Malaysia
Tomasz Jankowiak Poland
Kang Chen China
Md. Rehan Sadique India
Dong Lei China
Hao Fu China
Peng Ding relative to Zhiyi Huang China Zhiyi Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Zhiyi Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peng Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peng Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peng Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peng Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peng Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peng Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peng Ding. The network helps show where Peng Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peng Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peng Ding Line = papers co-authored together Peng Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201898
2 201998
3 202068
4 201355
5 202243
6 201839
7 202133
8 201032
9 201730
10 202225
11 201119
12 201916
13 202316
14 201815
15 201214
16 202414
17 201313
18 202212
19 202212
20 202311

About Peng Ding

Peng Ding is a scholar working on Civil and Structural Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 52 papers that have together received 782 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (12 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (7 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization (4 papers), Civil and Geotechnical Engineering Research (3 papers), Dental materials and restorations (3 papers), Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (2 papers), Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses (2 papers) and Geophysical Methods and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (206 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (455 citations), General Engineering (19 citations), Orthodontics (39 citations) and Building and Construction (86 citations). Peng Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lianjin Tao, Cheng Shi, Xiuren Yang, Sicheng Li, Yan Bao, Tianmin Shao, Songbo Wei, Xiaowa Wu, Bo Feng and Qiming Feng. Their work appears in journals such as Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Buildings, Diamond and Related Materials, Biomedical Materials and Applied Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact