Paul Stapleton

507 citations
40 papers · 374 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Stapleton

36 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Paul Stapleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Human-Computer Interaction 83
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 149
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 152
  • Music 22
  • Signal Processing 61
Replace Emma Frid with:
Emma Frid Sweden
Stefano Delle Monache Italy
Matteo Ricchetti Italy
Sarah Fdili Alaoui France
Franziska Schroeder United Kingdom
Jan Berg Netherlands
Barbara Mazzarino Italy
Luc Nijs Belgium
Stuart Cunningham United Kingdom
Helena Daffern United Kingdom
Paul Stapleton relative to Emma Frid Sweden Emma Frid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Emma Frid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Stapleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Stapleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Stapleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Stapleton. The network helps show where Paul Stapleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Paul Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Stapleton Line = papers co-authored together Paul Stapleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201139
2 201527
3 201726
4 201026
5 201325
6 201623
7 201722
8 202020
9 198018
10 202018
11 201016
12 201214
13 201712
14 201112
15 200910
16 19767
17 20096
18 20214
19 20064
20 20094

About Paul Stapleton

Paul Stapleton is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (15 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (8 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (6 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (6 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers) and Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (83 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (149 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (152 citations), Music (22 citations) and Signal Processing (61 citations). Paul Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Rodger, Michael Gurevich, J. Biely, Maarten van Walstijn, D.B. Bragg, Andrew McPherson, Martin Sawey, Miguel Ortiz, Marcelo M. Wanderley and Fabio Morreale. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Poultry Science, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Media International Australia and British Poultry Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact