Paul Stapleton

3.5k citations
105 papers · 2.7k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Stapleton

102 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Paul Stapleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Molecular Medicine 316
  • Literature and Literary Theory 554
  • Language and Linguistics 463
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 466
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 49
Replace Xi Chen with:
Xi Chen China
Isabel Solé Spain
Heather A. Kirkpatrick United States
Terry Kit-fong Au Hong Kong
Brigitte B. Denis Belgium
Melissa A. Bowles United States
Susan L. Davis United States
Michael A. Shapiro United States
Kathryn Holmes Australia
LLOYD E. DAVIS United States
Paul Stapleton relative to Xi Chen China Xi Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.1×
Xi Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Stapleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Stapleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Stapleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Stapleton. The network helps show where Paul Stapleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Stapleton Line = papers co-authored together Paul Stapleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995134
2 2017129
3 2001111
4 201592
5 200391
6 201990
7 200490
8 201089
9 201479
10 199175
11 201366
12 201165
13 201365
14 200261
15 200260
16 201057
17 199851
18 202050
19 201947
20 201841

About Paul Stapleton

Paul Stapleton is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Molecular Medicine and Education, having authored 105 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (17 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (16 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (16 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (12 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (10 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (9 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (7 papers) and Wikis in Education and Collaboration (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (316 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (554 citations), Language and Linguistics (463 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (466 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (49 citations). Paul Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Simon Gaisford, Rena Helms‐Park, Fulan Liu, Kevin P. Shannon, Abdul W. Basit, Cornelius Cecil Dodoo, Simon Gibbons, Ian Richard Phillips, Rui Eric Yuan and Gary L. French. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, ELT Journal, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Journal of Second Language Writing and Language Teaching Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact