Paul Johns

36 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Paul Johns
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Human-Computer Interaction 430
  • Information Systems and Management 328
  • Applied Psychology 165
  • Computer Science Applications 95
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 141
Replace Heather L. O’Brien with:
Heather L. O’Brien Canada
Yung-Ju Chang Taiwan
Sandy J. J. Gould United Kingdom
Panos Markopoulos Netherlands
Jason Wiese United States
Vaiva Kalnikaitė United Kingdom
Peter Ljungstrand Sweden
Daniel Buschek Germany
Penelope Sweetser Australia
Alexander De Luca Germany
Paul Johns relative to Heather L. O’Brien Canada Heather L. O’Brien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Heather L. O’Brien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Johns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Johns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Johns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Johns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Johns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Johns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Johns. The network helps show where Paul Johns may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Johns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Johns Line = papers co-authored together Paul Johns links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016118
2 2014116
3 2009100
4 201270
5 201466
6 201564
7 201457
8 200956
9 200956
10 201654
11 201350
12 201642
13 200941
14 201239
15 201728
16 202227
17 201727
18 201522
19 201621
20 201518

About Paul Johns

Paul Johns is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personal Information Management and User Behavior (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (6 papers), Mind wandering and attention (5 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers) and Color perception and design (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (430 citations), Information Systems and Management (328 citations), Applied Psychology (165 citations), Computer Science Applications (95 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (141 citations). Paul Johns has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Mary Czerwinski, Gloria Mark, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Asta Roseway, Akane Sano, Brian Meyers, Yuliya Lutchyn, Amy Karlson, Shaun K. Kane and Andy Jacobs. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact