Paul Howe

10.7k citations
130 papers · 6.2k · h-index 43

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Howe

128 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

Paul Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 5.7k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 2.9k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.7k
  • Geometry and Topology 843
  • Algebra and Number Theory 213
Replace Hermann Nicolai with:
Hermann Nicolai Germany
Warren Siegel United States
S. James Gates United States
E. Cremmer France
E. Sokatchev France
Ergin Sezgin United States
Eric D’Hoker United States
Herman Verlinde United States
Antoine Van Proeyen Belgium
M.T. Grisaru United States
Paul Howe relative to Hermann Nicolai Germany Hermann Nicolai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hermann Nicolai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Howe. The network helps show where Paul Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Howe Line = papers co-authored together Paul Howe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976364
2 1984318
3 1977313
4 1976274
5 1987233
6 1984196
7 1983195
8 1983158
9 1983151
10 1979129
11 1982128
12 1997125
13 1988109
14 1985106
15 1981103
16 198197
17 199691
18 197890
19 198087
20 199587

About Paul Howe

Paul Howe is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geometry and Topology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 130 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (118 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (49 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (42 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (40 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (24 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (15 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (15 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (5.7k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (2.9k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.7k citations), Geometry and Topology (843 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (213 citations). Paul Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include K.S. Stelle, Peter West, Lars Brink, Paul Townsend, P. Di Vecchia, G. Papadopoulos, Ergin Sezgin, Ulf Lindström, R.W. Tucker and Germán Sierra. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters B, Nuclear Physics B, Journal of High Energy Physics, Classical and Quantum Gravity and Communications in Mathematical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact