Paul E. Weiland

976 citations
11 papers · 671 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Paul E. Weiland

11 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers

Paul E. Weiland
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 380
  • Applied Psychology 44
  • Health 71
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 124
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 67
Replace Fung Kei Cheng with:
Fung Kei Cheng Hong Kong
J. Parker Goyer United States
Gerrit Glas Netherlands
Tiffany A. Ito United States
Kamel Gana France
Kathryn Jane Gardner United Kingdom
Jocelyn Sze United States
David S. Werman United States
Paweł Holas Poland
José M. García‐Montes Spain
Paul E. Weiland relative to Fung Kei Cheng Hong Kong Fung Kei Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Fung Kei Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul E. Weiland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul E. Weiland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul E. Weiland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul E. Weiland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul E. Weiland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul E. Weiland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul E. Weiland. The network helps show where Paul E. Weiland may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Paul E. Weiland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul E. Weiland Line = papers co-authored together Paul E. Weiland links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2005160
2 2005125
3 200598
4 200789
5 200583
6 200254
7 200225
8 200518
9 200115
10
The Influence of Regulatory Mode on the Use of Limited Self-Regulatory Resources and the Experience of Self-Regulation
20073
11 20021

About Paul E. Weiland

Paul E. Weiland is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Law, Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 11 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (3 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (2 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (380 citations), Applied Psychology (44 citations), Health (71 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (124 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (67 citations). Paul E. Weiland has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew L. Geers, Kristin Kosbab, Suzanne G. Helfer, G. Daniel Lassiter, Ian M. Handley, Catherine Loh, Cindy L. Rich, Christine A. Gidycz and Justin A. Wellman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Journal of Applied Psychology, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Child Abuse & Neglect.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact