G. Daniel Lassiter

58 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

G. Daniel Lassiter
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • General Decision Sciences 123
  • Applied Psychology 250
  • Social Psychology 815
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 521
  • Clinical Psychology 336
Replace Joel T. Johnson with:
Joel T. Johnson United States
Sean M. McCrea United States
Ian R. Newby‐Clark Canada
Lien B. Pham United States
Victor A. Harris United States
Joel D. Lieberman United States
Meryl Lichtenstein United States
Lisa Sinclair Canada
Hartmut Blank United Kingdom
Benzion Chanowitz United States
G. Daniel Lassiter relative to Joel T. Johnson United States Joel T. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joel T. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Daniel Lassiter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Daniel Lassiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Daniel Lassiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Daniel Lassiter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Daniel Lassiter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Daniel Lassiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Daniel Lassiter. The network helps show where G. Daniel Lassiter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Daniel Lassiter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Daniel Lassiter Line = papers co-authored together G. Daniel Lassiter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200498
2 200692
3 200985
4 199973
5 198571
6 200970
7 198670
8 200262
9 200258
10 200854
11 200254
12 198247
13 199145
14 200345
15 199243
16 198843
17 199141
18 200738
19 200234
20 199131

About G. Daniel Lassiter

G. Daniel Lassiter is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (24 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (19 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (12 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Jury Decision Making Processes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (123 citations), Applied Psychology (250 citations), Social Psychology (815 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (521 citations) and Clinical Psychology (336 citations). G. Daniel Lassiter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrew L. Geers, Ian M. Handley, Bella M. DePaulo, Michael A. Briggs, Jennifer J. Ratcliff, Audrey Irvine, Matthew J. Lindberg, Francis S. Bellezza, Justin A. Wellman and Claudia González‐Vallejo. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Psychological Science, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Basic and Applied Social Psychology and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact