Paul Brest

926 citations
31 papers · 496 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Brest

30 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Paul Brest
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Law 85
  • Public Administration 19
  • Information Systems and Management 35
  • Political Science and International Relations 97
  • Health Informatics 5
Replace Terence Karran with:
Terence Karran United Kingdom
Rafael Piñeiro Rodríguez Uruguay
Diana Kapiszewski United States
Fred R. Shapiro United States
Wendy A. Stock United States
Mark Gerard Murphy United Kingdom
Edgar S. Cahn United States
Jörgen S. Svensson Netherlands
Cathrine Holst Norway
James D. Savage United States
Paul Brest relative to Terence Karran United Kingdom Terence Karran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Terence Karran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Brest

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Brest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Brest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Brest more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Brest

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Brest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Brest. The network helps show where Paul Brest may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Paul Brest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Brest Line = papers co-authored together Paul Brest links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011204
2
Money well spent : a strategic plan for smart philanthropy
200853
3 199539
4 198125
5 201019
6 197619
7 197716
8
"Of Law and the River," and of Nihilism and Academic Freedom
198516
9 199511
10 197510
11 198210
12 19779
13 19828
14
In defense of strategic philanthropy.
20056
15 19876
16 20206
17
On Teaching Professional Judgment
19945
18
The Substance of Process
19814
19 19714
20
PROCESSES OF CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONMAKING
20064

About Paul Brest

Paul Brest is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Accounting, Economics and Econometrics and General Decision Sciences, having authored 31 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (6 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (3 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (3 papers), Business Law and Ethics (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (85 citations), Public Administration (19 citations), Information Systems and Management (35 citations), Political Science and International Relations (97 citations) and Health Informatics (5 citations). Paul Brest has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark J. Walport, Henry Paul Monaghan, Lawrence A. Alexander, Linda Hamilton Krieger, Ann E. Vandenberg, Paul D. Carrington, Owen M. Fiss, Peter W. Martin, Phillip E. Johnson and Guido Calabresi. Their work appears in journals such as Stanford Law Review, Michigan Law Review, Harvard Law Review, Journal of legal education and The Yale Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact