Ann E. Vandenberg

37 papers receiving 523 citations

Peers

Ann E. Vandenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 68
  • Family Practice 17
  • Nephrology 37
  • Gender Studies 52
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
Replace Simon Young with:
Simon Young Australia
Jessica Smith United States
Christine Stehman United States
Ayfer Karadakovan Türkiye
Richard E. Leiter United States
Kathryn Agarwal United States
Jessica C. Dudley United States
Keith Nockels United Kingdom
Tatjana T. Makovski Netherlands
Boon Peng Ng United States
Ann E. Vandenberg relative to Simon Young Australia Simon Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.4×
Simon Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann E. Vandenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann E. Vandenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann E. Vandenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann E. Vandenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann E. Vandenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann E. Vandenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann E. Vandenberg. The network helps show where Ann E. Vandenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann E. Vandenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann E. Vandenberg Line = papers co-authored together Ann E. Vandenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019102
2 201644
3 201742
4 201739
5 201538
6 201535
7 201527
8 201823
9 201620
10 201819
11 201619
12 201117
13 202114
14 201712
15 201610
16 20209
17 20198
18
Polypharmacy Review of Vulnerable Elders: Can We IMPROVE Outcomes?
20167
19 20216
20 19876

About Ann E. Vandenberg

Ann E. Vandenberg is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nephrology, Clinical Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (3 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (68 citations), Family Practice (17 citations), Nephrology (37 citations), Gender Studies (52 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations). Ann E. Vandenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Katharina V. Echt, Theodore M. Johnson, C. Barrett Bowling, Gerald McGwin, Camille P. Vaughan, Lawrence S. Phillips, Lynda A. Anderson, Anna Volerman, Nneka N. Ufere and Sarah Schaeffer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Kidney Medicine, Innovation in Aging, Arthritis Care & Research and International Journal for Quality in Health Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact