Paul Bourke

1.5k citations
73 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Bourke

65 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Paul Bourke
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 404
  • Space and Planetary Science 27
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 50
  • Geology 68
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 79
Replace Louis Borgeat with:
Louis Borgeat Canada
Xiaojun Cheng China
Jorik Blaas Netherlands
Andreas Klaus United States
Frédéric Bevilacqua France
A. Ravishankar Rao United States
Neil A. Thacker United Kingdom
Tak‐sum Wong United States
Vincent Barra France
Yehezkel Yeshurun Israel
Paul Bourke relative to Louis Borgeat Canada Louis Borgeat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Louis Borgeat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Bourke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Bourke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Bourke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Bourke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Bourke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Bourke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Bourke. The network helps show where Paul Bourke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Bourke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Bourke Line = papers co-authored together Paul Bourke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998101
2 200183
3 200076
4 198871
5 201363
6 201740
7
An Advanced, Three-Dimensional Plotting Library for Astronomy
200639
8 200336
9 200234
10 201631
11 200031
12 200527
13 201525
14 202024
15 200621
16 200621
17 200320
18 200419
19 200619
20 201318

About Paul Bourke

Paul Bourke is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Geology, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (19 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (11 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (11 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (11 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (404 citations), Space and Planetary Science (27 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (50 citations), Geology (68 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (79 citations). Paul Bourke has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. J. Wright, P. A. Robinson, Michael C. Lawrence, Chris Rennie, James J. Wright, David G. Lloyd, Jacqueline Alderson, Brendan Lay, Robert Scragg and David M. Alexander. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Graphics, Fractals, Physics of Life Reviews, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia and Vision Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact