Patrick T. Smith

37 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers

Patrick T. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Health 69
  • Clinical Psychology 70
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 88
  • Health Informatics 3
  • General Health Professions 41
Replace Jamie Mihoko Doyle with:
Jamie Mihoko Doyle United States
Kenna Quinet United States
Sean A. Valles United States
Elizabeth Roberto United States
Daniel Ricardo de Castro Cerqueira Brazil
Greg Bognar United States
Laney A. Rupp United States
Suzanne Poynton Australia
Anne Herm Estonia
Rhiannon Morgan United Kingdom
Patrick T. Smith relative to Jamie Mihoko Doyle United States Jamie Mihoko Doyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Jamie Mihoko Doyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick T. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick T. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick T. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick T. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick T. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick T. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick T. Smith. The network helps show where Patrick T. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patrick T. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick T. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Patrick T. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201528
2 199622
3 201520
4 201518
5 202214
6 201711
7 20178
8
International Distributive Justice
20138
9 20188
10 20158
11 19977
12 20186
13 20175
14 20205
15
The Intergenerational Storm: Dilemma or Domination
20135
16 20145
17 20214
18 20184
19 20174
20 20214

About Patrick T. Smith

Patrick T. Smith is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Health, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (8 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (6 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (6 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers), International Development and Aid (3 papers) and Space exploration and regulation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (69 citations), Clinical Psychology (70 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (88 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations) and General Health Professions (41 citations). Patrick T. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tracy A. Balboni, Michael J. Balboni, Tyler J. VanderWeele, Christine Mitchell, Michael Balboni, Danielle Rodin, Michael Blake, Faith E. Fletcher, Virginia LeBaron and Virginia Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, The Hastings Center Report, The American Journal of Bioethics, International Affairs and Journal of Palliative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact