Patrick Stokes
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Media, Religion, Digital Communication
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Papers in
- Philosophy 29
- Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence 13
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 9
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 8
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 5
-
- Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy 4
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 3
Patrick Stokes
45 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Philosophy 170
- Clinical Psychology 105
- Social Psychology 69
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
- Cultural Studies 19
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Stokes
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Stokes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Stokes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Stokes. The network helps show where Patrick Stokes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 6 | Kierkegaard’s Mirrors: Interest, Self, and Moral Vision | 2009 | 15 |
| 7 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 14 | What’s missing in episodic selfhood? A Kierkegaardian response to Galen Strawson | 2010 | 6 |
| 15 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 4 |
About Patrick Stokes
Patrick Stokes is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 50 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (13 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (9 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (8 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (4 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (4 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (170 citations), Clinical Psychology (105 citations), Social Psychology (69 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations) and Cultural Studies (19 citations). Patrick Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Inquiry, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, European Journal of Philosophy and Social Epistemology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.