Patrick Forber

27 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers

Patrick Forber
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • History and Philosophy of Science 192
  • Safety Research 74
  • Sociology and Political Science 237
  • Genetics 144
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
Replace Angela Potochnik with:
Angela Potochnik United States
Werner Callebaut Austria
Alex Rosenberg United States
C. Kenneth Waters United States
Thomas A. C. Reydon Germany
Simon M. Huttegger United States
Elliot Sober United States
Rory Smead United States
Michael Ruse Canada
André Ariew United States
Patrick Forber relative to Angela Potochnik United States Angela Potochnik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Angela Potochnik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Forber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Forber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Forber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Forber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Forber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Forber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Forber. The network helps show where Patrick Forber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Forber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick Forber Line = papers co-authored together Patrick Forber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200567
2 201054
3 201443
4 201141
5 201433
6 201232
7 200829
8 200824
9 202117
10 200516
11 200715
12 201610
13 20119
14 20079
15 20218
16 20148
17 20087
18 20157
19 20076
20 20126

About Patrick Forber

Patrick Forber is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Genetics, Safety Research and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (11 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (7 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Game Theory and Applications (3 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (2 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (192 citations), Safety Research (74 citations), Sociology and Political Science (237 citations), Genetics (144 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (60 citations). Patrick Forber has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Rory Smead, Kenneth Reisman, Eric C. Griffith, Ronald Sandler, John Basl, Christoph Riedl, Brian Epstein, Michael Foley and Robert C. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Biology & Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Nature Climate Change and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact