Pascal Probst
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Markus Wolfgang Büchler (62 shared papers)Markus K. Diener (67 shared papers)Thilo Hackert (46 shared papers)André L. Mihaljević (20 shared papers)Phillip Knebel (33 shared papers)Ulla Klaiber (21 shared papers)Beat Peter Müller-Stich (25 shared papers)Alexis B. Ulrich (25 shared papers)
- Journals
- British journal of surgery (24 papers)Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery (15 papers)BMJ Open (13 papers)Annals of Surgery (13 papers)HPB (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Pascal Probst
166 papers receiving 4.3k citations
Pascal Probst's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Oncology 1.6k
- Surgery 1.7k
- Hepatology 223
- Emergency Medicine 160
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 141
Countries citing papers authored by Pascal Probst
This map shows the geographic impact of Pascal Probst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pascal Probst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pascal Probst more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pascal Probst
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pascal Probst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pascal Probst. The network helps show where Pascal Probst may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pascal Probst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 188 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 226 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 217 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 188 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 154 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 147 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 147 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 131 | |
| 8 | Postpancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis (PPAP) Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 122 |
| 9 | 2017 | 103 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 100 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 87 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 77 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 75 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 74 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 72 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 68 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 67 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 65 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 62 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 62 |
About Pascal Probst
Pascal Probst is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Hepatology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 188 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (55 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (19 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (13 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (11 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (11 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (11 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (6 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.6k citations), Surgery (1.7k citations), Hepatology (223 citations), Emergency Medicine (160 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (141 citations). Pascal Probst has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Markus Wolfgang Büchler, Markus K. Diener, Thilo Hackert, André L. Mihaljević, Phillip Knebel, Ulla Klaiber, Beat Peter Müller-Stich, Alexis B. Ulrich, Kathrin Grummich and Felix Jakob Hüttner. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery, BMJ Open, Annals of Surgery and HPB.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.