Oliver Strobel
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Markus Wolfgang Büchler (169 shared papers)Thilo Hackert (147 shared papers)Ulf Hinz (71 shared papers)Jens Werner (47 shared papers)Dirk Jäger (10 shared papers)Werner Hartwig (30 shared papers)John P. Neoptolemos (13 shared papers)Lutz Schneider (25 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Oliver Strobel
328 papers receiving 13.1k citations
Oliver Strobel's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Oncology 9.5k
- Surgery 1.9k
- Cancer Research 507
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 551
- Gastroenterology 120
Countries citing papers authored by Oliver Strobel
This map shows the geographic impact of Oliver Strobel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oliver Strobel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oliver Strobel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Oliver Strobel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oliver Strobel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oliver Strobel. The network helps show where Oliver Strobel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Oliver Strobel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 353 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 697 |
| 2 | 2016 | 412 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 352 | |
| 4 | Definition and classification of chyle leak after pancreatic operation: A consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 305 |
| 5 | 2016 | 280 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 251 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 230 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 224 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 217 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 204 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 201 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 200 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 197 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 194 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 178 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 176 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 164 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 161 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 154 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 154 |
About Oliver Strobel
Oliver Strobel is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Hepatology, having authored 353 papers that have together received 13.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (235 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (36 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (16 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (9 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (8 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (6 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (5 papers) and Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (9.5k citations), Surgery (1.9k citations), Cancer Research (507 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (551 citations) and Gastroenterology (120 citations). Oliver Strobel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Markus Wolfgang Büchler, Thilo Hackert, Ulf Hinz, Jens Werner, Dirk Jäger, Werner Hartwig, John P. Neoptolemos, Lutz Schneider, Frank Bergmann and Stefan Fritz. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, Surgery, HPB, Pancreatology and British journal of surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.