Pan‐Ming Chen

827 citations
22 papers · 615 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Pan‐Ming Chen

22 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

Pan‐Ming Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Reproductive Medicine 122
  • Gastroenterology 65
  • Biological Psychiatry 9
  • Neurology 38
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 84
Replace Riyad Peeraully with:
Riyad Peeraully United Kingdom
LesleyH. Rees United Kingdom
Priti Bajaj Denmark
Paulo Dinis Portugal
Salvador Castells United States
Sharmin A Hossain United States
Konstantinos Kamperis Denmark
Valeria Bachiocco Italy
Toyoko Asami Japan
M A Magiakou United States
Pan‐Ming Chen relative to Riyad Peeraully United Kingdom Riyad Peeraully's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.5×
Riyad Peeraully · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pan‐Ming Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pan‐Ming Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pan‐Ming Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pan‐Ming Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pan‐Ming Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pan‐Ming Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pan‐Ming Chen. The network helps show where Pan‐Ming Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pan‐Ming Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pan‐Ming Chen Line = papers co-authored together Pan‐Ming Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014124
2 201585
3 201350
4 201648
5 201544
6 201443
7 201638
8 201421
9 201821
10 201318
11 201616
12 201415
13 201514
14 201514
15 201914
16 201412
17 201611
18 20138
19 20137
20 20166

About Pan‐Ming Chen

Pan‐Ming Chen is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Gastroenterology, Oncology, Rheumatology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (1 paper), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (122 citations), Gastroenterology (65 citations), Biological Psychiatry (9 citations), Neurology (38 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (84 citations). Pan‐Ming Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Li‐Yu Hu, Ti Lu, Cheng‐Che Shen, Albert C. Yang, Shih‐Jen Tsai, Yu‐Wen Hu, Chiu‐Mei Yeh, Tzeng‐Ji Chen, Chia‐Jen Liu and Shu‐Li Wang. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Medicine, BMC Psychiatry, Annals of Epidemiology and Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact