P. Tchénio

1.6k citations
49 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

P. Tchénio

49 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

P. Tchénio
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 441
  • Biophysics 130
  • Structural Biology 25
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 391
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 106
Replace Guy W. J. Moss with:
Guy W. J. Moss United Kingdom
Laurent Moreaux France
Igor Vodyanoy United States
Katjuša Brejc United States
A. Lewis United States
D. Marien Cortés United States
P. G. Haydon United Kingdom
Masayoshi Ito Japan
Masashi Tanaka Japan
Ana‐Nicoleta Bondar Germany
P. Tchénio relative to Guy W. J. Moss United Kingdom Guy W. J. Moss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Guy W. J. Moss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Tchénio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Tchénio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Tchénio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Tchénio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Tchénio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Tchénio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Tchénio. The network helps show where P. Tchénio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Tchénio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Tchénio Line = papers co-authored together P. Tchénio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011181
2 2010168
3 199471
4 200667
5 199359
6 199354
7 201552
8 200051
9 199950
10 199346
11 200427
12 200325
13 200024
14 200324
15 200021
16 198921
17 201717
18 200517
19 200317
20 199416

About P. Tchénio

P. Tchénio is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum optics and atomic interactions (9 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (9 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (8 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (5 papers) and Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (441 citations), Biophysics (130 citations), Structural Biology (25 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (391 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (106 citations). P. Tchénio has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Préat, Anne Débarre, W. E. Moerner, Anne B. Myers, Nicolas Gervasi, Antonin Richard, J.-L. Le Gouët, J. Keller, Pierre‐Yves Musso and Rodolphe Jaffiol. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Physics Letters, Journal of the Optical Society of America B, Journal of Luminescence, Physical Review Letters and Europhysics Letters (EPL).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact