P. Moch

1.2k citations
89 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

P. Moch

85 papers receiving 983 citations

Peers

P. Moch
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 531
  • Condensed Matter Physics 287
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 647
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 13
  • Materials Chemistry 369
Replace N. S. Averkiev with:
N. S. Averkiev Russia
N. M. Kreǐnes Russia
В. Н. Гриднев Russia
B. Prévot France
Hirotoshi Nagata Japan
M. S. Osofsky United States
S. S. Jiang China
Mitsuru Matsuura Japan
R. Henn Germany
Z. D. Zhang China
P. Moch relative to N. S. Averkiev Russia N. S. Averkiev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
N. S. Averkiev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Moch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Moch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Moch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Moch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Moch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Moch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Moch. The network helps show where P. Moch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Moch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Moch Line = papers co-authored together P. Moch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013110
2 200169
3 200967
4 200454
5 199547
6 200143
7 201037
8 196636
9 196427
10 196826
11 199925
12 200724
13 201123
14 200322
15 199722
16 200021
17 200321
18 197317
19 197015
20 199015

About P. Moch

P. Moch is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (30 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (24 papers), Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (24 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (13 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (12 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (11 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (10 papers) and Multiferroics and related materials (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (531 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (287 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (647 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (13 citations) and Materials Chemistry (369 citations). P. Moch has collaborated with scholars based in France, Czechia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include S. M. Chérif, C. Dugautier, Y. Roussigné, F. Ganot, F. Zighem, M. Belmeguenai, M. Bałkanski, G. Parisot, Philippe Djémia and R. Farhi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physical Review B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact