P. Moch

1.2k citations
87 papers · 996 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

P. Moch

85 papers receiving 952 citations

Peers

P. Moch
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 509
  • Condensed Matter Physics 276
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 611
  • Materials Chemistry 359
  • Inorganic Chemistry 90
Replace R. Henn with:
R. Henn Germany
R. C. C. Ward United Kingdom
A. N. Basu India
Raymond G. Greene United States
A. G. Petukhov United States
G. Kalkowski Germany
W. L. Hults United States
Hajime Ishikawa Japan
Krzysztof Rapcewicz United States
F.J.A.M. Greidanus Netherlands
P. Moch relative to R. Henn Germany R. Henn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
R. Henn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Moch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Moch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Moch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Moch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Moch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Moch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Moch. The network helps show where P. Moch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Moch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Moch Line = papers co-authored together P. Moch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013109
2 200168
3 200967
4 200449
5 199545
6 200142
7 201037
8 196633
9 196426
10 200724
11 199924
12 201123
13 200021
14 196821
15 200320
16 200320
17 199719
18 197015
19 197314
20 198213

About P. Moch

P. Moch is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 87 papers that have together received 996 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (30 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (23 papers), Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (22 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (13 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (11 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (11 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (10 papers) and Multiferroics and related materials (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (509 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (276 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (611 citations), Materials Chemistry (359 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (90 citations). P. Moch has collaborated with scholars based in France, Czechia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include S. M. Chérif, Y. Roussigné, C. Dugautier, F. Ganot, F. Zighem, M. Belmeguenai, M. Bałkanski, Philippe Djémia, G. Parisot and R. Farhi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physical Review B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact