P. E. Easterling

54 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

P. E. Easterling
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Anthropology 572
  • Classics 52
  • Philosophy 138
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 66
  • Language and Linguistics 72
Replace Mark Griffith with:
Mark Griffith United Kingdom
Oliver Taplin United States
Richard Hunter United Kingdom
Lowell Edmunds United States
Ruth Webb France
James I. Porter United States
Niall W. Slater United States
Michael S. Silk United Kingdom
Erich Segal United Kingdom
Andrew Feldherr United States
P. E. Easterling relative to Mark Griffith United Kingdom Mark Griffith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mark Griffith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. E. Easterling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. E. Easterling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. E. Easterling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. E. Easterling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. E. Easterling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. E. Easterling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. E. Easterling. The network helps show where P. E. Easterling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside P. E. Easterling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. E. Easterling Line = papers co-authored together P. E. Easterling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197382
2
Greek religion and society
198563
3 198861
4 198551
5 200444
6 201044
7
Euripides Outside Athens: A Speculative Note
199440
8
GREEK SCRIPTS An Illustrated Introduction
200139
9 200936
10 199133
11 197731
12 198521
13 199718
14 197417
15 199717
16
Gilbert Murray's Reading of Euripides
199716
17
Philoctetes and Modern Criticism
197814
18 198714
19 198411
20 198511

About P. E. Easterling

P. E. Easterling is a scholar working on Anthropology, Language and Linguistics, History, Philosophy and Classics, having authored 82 papers that have together received 789 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (73 papers), Classical Studies and Philology (14 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (5 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (3 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (2 papers) and Thomas Hardy Literature Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (572 citations), Classics (52 citations), Philosophy (138 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (66 citations) and Language and Linguistics (72 citations). P. E. Easterling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include J. V. Muir, Bernard M. W. Knox, Felix Budelmann, Edith Hall, John P. Barron, Ruby Blondell, Richard Hamilton, John Herington, R. D. Dawe and D. J. Conacher. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Phoenix, Greece and Rome, The Classical Quarterly and The Journal of Hellenic Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact