P Decléty

489 citations
12 papers · 325 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 4
    • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 1

P Decléty

11 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers

P Decléty
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 111
  • Emergency Medicine 91
  • Neurology 104
  • Surgery 79
  • Internal Medicine 4
Replace Frieda Hulka with:
Frieda Hulka United States
Andrea Nanni Italy
Eric Chin United States
John T. Steele United States
Pjd Andrews United Kingdom
Bruce Barnhart United States
Teresa Honrado Portugal
Pauline Deras France
Andrew Jagoda United States
Becky Inderbitzen United States
P Decléty relative to Frieda Hulka United States Frieda Hulka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Frieda Hulka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P Decléty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P Decléty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P Decléty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P Decléty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P Decléty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P Decléty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P Decléty. The network helps show where P Decléty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P Decléty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P Decléty Line = papers co-authored together P Decléty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2010183
2 201151
3 200546
4 201014
5 201611
6 20159
7 20096
8 20092
9 20121
10
[Interpretation of chest radiographs in the intensive care unit: a hard- versus soft-copy comparative study].
20031
11 19961
12 20070

About P Decléty

P Decléty is a scholar working on Neurology, Surgery, Physiology, Molecular Biology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (1 paper), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper), S100 Proteins and Annexins (1 paper), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (111 citations), Emergency Medicine (91 citations), Neurology (104 citations), Surgery (79 citations) and Internal Medicine (4 citations). P Decléty has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include C. Broux, T. Martinelli, Jérôme Tonetti, Christian Sengel, J Payen, G. Ferretti, F. Thony, Jean‐François Payen, C. Jacquot and Julien Brun. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive Care Medicine, Neurosurgery, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine and Réanimation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact