Oonagh Redmond

1.0k citations
22 papers · 868 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Oonagh Redmond

22 papers receiving 824 citations

Peers

Oonagh Redmond
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 427
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 196
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 155
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 94
  • Neurology 55
Replace D. M. Kean with:
D. M. Kean United Kingdom
Joseph T. Ennis Ireland
Lalith Talagala United States
Alexander de Crespigny United States
N.J. Yasillo United States
A. Alavi United States
Arístides A. Capizzano United States
F. Gückel Germany
Hans‐Wilhelm Müller‐Gärtner Germany
Hiroshi Hamakawa Japan
Oonagh Redmond relative to D. M. Kean United Kingdom D. M. Kean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
D. M. Kean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Oonagh Redmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oonagh Redmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oonagh Redmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oonagh Redmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Oonagh Redmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oonagh Redmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oonagh Redmond. The network helps show where Oonagh Redmond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Oonagh Redmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Oonagh Redmond Line = papers co-authored together Oonagh Redmond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990213
2 1994138
3 199582
4 199061
5 199143
6 198940
7 199238
8 199536
9 199333
10 199030
11 198830
12 199225
13 199522
14 199122
15 199221
16 199117
17 19897
18 19923
19 19943
20 19932

About Oonagh Redmond

Oonagh Redmond is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (427 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (196 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (155 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (94 citations) and Neurology (55 citations). Oonagh Redmond has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include J.P. Stack, J. T. Ennis, P. Dervan, Mary Codd, Joseph T. Ennis, Conall Larkin, John L. Waddington, Eadbhard O’Callaghan, P.F. Buckley and Anthony Kinsella. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Biological Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Radiology and Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact