Oonagh Redmond

1.0k citations
22 papers · 811 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Oonagh Redmond

22 papers receiving 784 citations

Peers

Oonagh Redmond
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 455
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 222
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 189
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 114
  • Neurology 62
Replace D. M. Kean with:
D. M. Kean United Kingdom
Alexander de Crespigny United States
N.J. Yasillo United States
G. du Boulay United Kingdom
J.J. Mateos Spain
S. Gacinovic United Kingdom
Sarah C. Reitz Germany
Joseph T. Ennis Ireland
Walter Möller‐Hartmann Germany
A. Alavi United States
Oonagh Redmond relative to D. M. Kean United Kingdom D. M. Kean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
D. M. Kean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Oonagh Redmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oonagh Redmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oonagh Redmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oonagh Redmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Oonagh Redmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oonagh Redmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oonagh Redmond. The network helps show where Oonagh Redmond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Oonagh Redmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Oonagh Redmond Line = papers co-authored together Oonagh Redmond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990199
2 1994133
3 199579
4 199056
5 199140
6 198937
7 199535
8 199235
9 199330
10 198829
11 199029
12 199224
13 199519
14 199118
15 199117
16 199215
17 19896
18 19923
19 19943
20 19932

About Oonagh Redmond

Oonagh Redmond is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 811 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (455 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (222 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (189 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (114 citations) and Neurology (62 citations). Oonagh Redmond has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J.P. Stack, J. T. Ennis, P. Dervan, Joseph T. Ennis, Conall Larkin, Mary Codd, John L. Waddington, Eadbhard O’Callaghan, P.F. Buckley and Anthony Kinsella. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Biological Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Radiology and Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact