Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz

17 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Horticulture 7
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 9
  • Animal Science and Zoology 57
  • Food Science 86
  • Small Animals 33
Replace Federico J. Holmann with:
Federico J. Holmann United States
Regina Roessler Germany
Afrânio Márcio Corrêa Vieira Brazil
Elena Angón Spain
Anastacio García-Martínez Mexico
Joanne De Faveri Australia
Mouad Chentouf Belgium
Ponciano Pérez-Hernández Mexico
A. Willam Austria
Maria Aparecida da Silva Brazil
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz relative to Federico J. Holmann United States Federico J. Holmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Federico J. Holmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz. The network helps show where Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz Line = papers co-authored together Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201285
2 201975
3 202340
4 201926
5 201224
6 202018
7 202011
8 202211
9 20059
10 20178
11 20206
12 20225
13 20185
14 19994
15
Assessing the risk posed to plant health by Xylella fastidiosa in the European Union
20153
16 20212
17 20041
18 20180
19
An improved method for qualitative risk assessment - validation and application to a bee pest.
20140

About Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz

Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (3 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers), Research on scale insects (3 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (3 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (2 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (7 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (9 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (57 citations), Food Science (86 citations) and Small Animals (33 citations). Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Sara Tramontini, Claudio Lovisolo, Jean‐Christophe Domec, Agnès Destrac-Irvine, Marco Vitali, Cornelis van Leeuwen, Anthony Smith, Natalie von Goetz, Andrew Hart and Caroline Merten. Their work appears in journals such as EFSA Journal, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Foodborne Pathogens and Disease and Plant and Soil.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact