Odd Langholm

706 citations
30 papers · 241 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Odd Langholm

22 papers receiving 171 citations

Peers

Odd Langholm
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Political Science and International Relations 131
  • Philosophy 57
  • Classics 18
  • Economics and Econometrics 103
  • Anthropology 32
Replace Benjamin N. Nelson with:
Benjamin N. Nelson United Kingdom
Marjorie Grice–Hutchinson
M. S. Anderson Mexico
Jacques Steenbergen Belgium
Jean Dunbabin United States
Hermann Kellenbenz Germany
Udo Heyn United States
Jonathan Grant United States
Roland Mousnier France
G. H. Guttridge United States
Odd Langholm relative to Benjamin N. Nelson United Kingdom Benjamin N. Nelson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Benjamin N. Nelson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Odd Langholm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Odd Langholm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Odd Langholm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Odd Langholm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Odd Langholm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Odd Langholm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Odd Langholm. The network helps show where Odd Langholm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Odd Langholm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Odd Langholm Line = papers co-authored together Odd Langholm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Aristotelian analysis of usury
198480
2 199841
3 198024
4 198216
5
Wealth and Money in the Aristotelian Tradition: A Study in Scholastic Economic Sources
198511
6 20098
7 19878
8 19988
9 20098
10 20066
11 20066
12 19775
13 19653
14 19983
15 19723
16 19683
17 20062
18
The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought
20061
19 19921
20 19921

About Odd Langholm

Odd Langholm is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, History, Philosophy and Classics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Legal Thought (17 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (1 paper) and Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (131 citations), Philosophy (57 citations), Classics (18 citations), Economics and Econometrics (103 citations) and Anthropology (32 citations). Odd Langholm has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Sean Lowry, James R. Nelson, Nicole Oresme and Bertram Schefold. Their work appears in journals such as History of Political Economy, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Journal of Accounting Research, Econometrica and European Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact