Norbert Stoop

36 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

Norbert Stoop
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Condensed Matter Physics 149
  • Mechanical Engineering 412
  • Cell Biology 130
  • Reproductive Medicine 50
  • Computational Mechanics 96
Replace Eric E. Keaveny with:
Eric E. Keaveny United Kingdom
Arvind Gopinath United States
G.H.M. van der Heijden United Kingdom
José Alvarado United States
Efi Efrati Israel
Kukjin Chun South Korea
Alexander B. Stilgoe Australia
Daniel S. W. Tam Netherlands
Daniel M. Sussman United States
Motohisa Hirano Japan
Norbert Stoop relative to Eric E. Keaveny United Kingdom Eric E. Keaveny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.1×
Eric E. Keaveny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Norbert Stoop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Norbert Stoop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norbert Stoop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norbert Stoop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Norbert Stoop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norbert Stoop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norbert Stoop. The network helps show where Norbert Stoop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Norbert Stoop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Norbert Stoop Line = papers co-authored together Norbert Stoop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015210
2 201587
3 201773
4 201861
5 201156
6 201649
7 200846
8 201742
9 201941
10 201033
11 201832
12 201228
13 201327
14 201224
15 201222
16 200420
17 201820
18 201819
19 201818
20 200416

About Norbert Stoop

Norbert Stoop is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Mechanical Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Materials and Mechanics (14 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (7 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (5 papers), Complex Systems and Dynamics (5 papers), Elasticity and Material Modeling (4 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (3 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (3 papers) and Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (149 citations), Mechanical Engineering (412 citations), Cell Biology (130 citations), Reproductive Medicine (50 citations) and Computational Mechanics (96 citations). Norbert Stoop has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Jörn Dunkel, Falk K. Wittel, Pedro M. Reis, Romain Lagrange, Denis Terwagne, Hans Jürgen Herrmann, Pearson W. Miller, Matteo Pezzulla, Douglas P. Holmes and Ruedi Stoop. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics and Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact