Norbert Kinkl

1.7k citations
21 papers · 1.4k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Norbert Kinkl

20 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Norbert Kinkl
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Neurology 426
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 335
  • Neurology 133
  • Cell Biology 252
  • Ophthalmology 123
Replace Irina Surgucheva with:
Irina Surgucheva United States
Chiara Criscuolo Italy
Chun‐hong Xia United States
David Soto Spain
Kazutoshi Nishiyama Japan
Elisabetta Babetto United States
Ulrike Orth Germany
Qiudong Deng United States
Paymaan Jafar‐Nejad United States
Marcel V. Alavi Germany
Norbert Kinkl relative to Irina Surgucheva United States Irina Surgucheva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Irina Surgucheva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Norbert Kinkl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Norbert Kinkl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norbert Kinkl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norbert Kinkl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Norbert Kinkl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norbert Kinkl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norbert Kinkl. The network helps show where Norbert Kinkl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Norbert Kinkl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Norbert Kinkl Line = papers co-authored together Norbert Kinkl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005388
2 1998119
3 2006107
4 2010103
5 200787
6 201181
7 199881
8 200879
9 200165
10 200742
11 200339
12 199935
13
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and candidate signaling molecule distribution within rat and human retina.
200234
14 201133
15 199728
16 200327
17 20088
18 20127
19 20097
20 20124

About Norbert Kinkl

Norbert Kinkl is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Cell Biology and Neurology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Fibroblast Growth Factor Research (3 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (2 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (2 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (2 papers) and Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (426 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (335 citations), Neurology (133 citations), Cell Biology (252 citations) and Ophthalmology (123 citations). Norbert Kinkl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marius Ueffing, José‐Alain Sahel, David Hicks, Ralf J. Braun, Christian Johannes Gloeckner, Thomas Meitinger, Walter Kölch, Holger Prokisch, Eric O’Neill and Valérie Fontaine. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vision Research, Journal of Neuroscience and Gene Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact