Norbert J. Sack

566 citations
29 papers · 516 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Norbert J. Sack

23 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Norbert J. Sack
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 169
  • Atmospheric Science 119
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 178
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 40
  • Computational Mechanics 94
Replace V. N. Ageev with:
V. N. Ageev Russia
William C. Simpson United States
B. Steiner United States
Eric K. L. Wong United States
Keith B. Rider United States
L. S. Farenzena Brazil
Hsiao‐Chi Lu Taiwan
Peter M. Mul Netherlands
C. Emil Tripa United States
C. G. Venkatesh United States
Norbert J. Sack relative to V. N. Ageev Russia V. N. Ageev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
V. N. Ageev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Norbert J. Sack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Norbert J. Sack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norbert J. Sack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norbert J. Sack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Norbert J. Sack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norbert J. Sack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norbert J. Sack. The network helps show where Norbert J. Sack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Norbert J. Sack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Norbert J. Sack Line = papers co-authored together Norbert J. Sack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993169
2 199265
3 199439
4 199431
5 199527
6 199122
7 199521
8 199619
9 199518
10 199617
11 199516
12 199515
13 199614
14 199412
15 19936
16 19885
17 19884
18 19954
19 19903
20 19892

About Norbert J. Sack

Norbert J. Sack is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Radiation and Atmospheric Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), International Science and Diplomacy (3 papers), Civil and Structural Engineering Research (3 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (169 citations), Atmospheric Science (119 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (178 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (40 citations) and Computational Mechanics (94 citations). Norbert J. Sack has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R. A. Baragiola, Theodore E. Madey, Mustafa E. S. Akbulut, R. A. Baragiola, John W. Boring, R. E. Johnson, Lekha Nair, R. E. Johnson, Martin Vicanek and Peter Klein. Their work appears in journals such as Surface Science, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Icarus, Earth Moon and Planets and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact