Nora Chiang

21 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Nora Chiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Toxicology 139
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 507
  • Pharmacology 238
  • Biological Psychiatry 29
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 109
Replace Debra Harris with:
Debra Harris United States
Thomas R. Kosten United States
Ofra Sarid‐Segal United States
Shanna Babalonis United States
Erik W. Gunderson United States
Raka Jain India
Kevin P. Hill United States
Emily B. Einstein United States
Amine Benyamina France
Geoffrey K. Mumford United States
Nora Chiang relative to Debra Harris United States Debra Harris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Debra Harris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nora Chiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nora Chiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nora Chiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nora Chiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nora Chiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nora Chiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nora Chiang. The network helps show where Nora Chiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nora Chiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nora Chiang Line = papers co-authored together Nora Chiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009179
2 2007174
3 2005133
4 201187
5 201684
6 200671
7 200958
8 201551
9 200549
10 200643
11 200537
12 201634
13 200325
14 200523
15 198519
16
The Overseas Chinese in Australasia: History, Settlement, and Interactions
200115
17 200712
18 20186
19
Is quantitative urinalysis more sensitive?
19974
20
Pharmacologic interactions between transdermal selegiline and cocaine
20011

About Nora Chiang

Nora Chiang is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Toxicology, Neurology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (6 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (139 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (507 citations), Pharmacology (238 citations), Biological Psychiatry (29 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (109 citations). Nora Chiang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ahmed Elkashef, Roberta Kahn, John D. Roache, Tyson H. Holmes, A. Anderson, Thomas F. Newton, Frank J. Vocci, Christopher L. Wallace, Shou-Hua Li and Richard De La Garza. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychopharmacology, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse and CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact