Nora Breen
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Face Recognition and Perception
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Philosophy top 1%
- Mental Health and Psychiatry
Papers in
-
- Face Recognition and Perception 8
- Memory Processes and Influences 2
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 2
-
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 3
- Co-authors
- Max Coltheart (10 shared papers)Diana Caine (8 shared papers)Robyn Langdon (3 shared papers)Martin Davies (1 shared paper)Karalyn Patterson (1 shared paper)Ada Kritikos (1 shared paper)Jason B. Mattingley (1 shared paper)Martha Turner (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (2 papers)Cortex (2 papers)Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2 papers)Neurocase (2 papers)Audiology and Neurotology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nora Breen
17 papers receiving 704 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Cognitive Neuroscience 511
- Philosophy 229
- Psychiatry and Mental health 198
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 119
- Social Psychology 138
Countries citing papers authored by Nora Breen
This map shows the geographic impact of Nora Breen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nora Breen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nora Breen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nora Breen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nora Breen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nora Breen. The network helps show where Nora Breen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nora Breen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 253 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 127 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 122 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 1 |
About Nora Breen
Nora Breen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Neurology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (8 papers), Face recognition and analysis (3 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (511 citations), Philosophy (229 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (198 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (119 citations) and Social Psychology (138 citations). Nora Breen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Max Coltheart, Diana Caine, Robyn Langdon, Martin Davies, Karalyn Patterson, Ada Kritikos, Jason B. Mattingley, Martha Turner, Blossom C. M. Stephan and Akira R. O’Connor. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Cortex, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Neurocase and Audiology and Neurotology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.