Noboru Arimura

1.2k citations
20 papers · 816 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Noboru Arimura

20 papers receiving 784 citations

Peers

Noboru Arimura
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Ophthalmology 380
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 230
  • Neurology 52
  • Clinical Biochemistry 40
  • Immunology 57
Replace Yan-Nian Hui with:
Yan-Nian Hui China
Stephan Hoffmann Germany
Albert Caramoy Germany
D Chauvaud France
Alexandra Lappas Germany
Mitra Farnoodian United States
Maurice Schallenberg Germany
Manlin Jin United States
Swaantje Peters Germany
Valeria E. Lorenc United States
Noboru Arimura relative to Yan-Nian Hui China Yan-Nian Hui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Yan-Nian Hui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noboru Arimura

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noboru Arimura's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noboru Arimura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noboru Arimura more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noboru Arimura

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noboru Arimura. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noboru Arimura. The network helps show where Noboru Arimura may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noboru Arimura, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noboru Arimura Line = papers co-authored together Noboru Arimura links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2012135
2 201074
3 200968
4 200956
5 201354
6 200854
7 201653
8 200952
9 200748
10 201340
11 201136
12 201033
13 201124
14 201022
15 200720
16 201015
17 201013
18 200910
19 20115
20 20214

About Noboru Arimura

Noboru Arimura is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry and Neurology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 816 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (3 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Advanced Glycation End Products research (2 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (1 paper) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (380 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (230 citations), Neurology (52 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (40 citations) and Immunology (57 citations). Noboru Arimura has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Taiji Sakamoto, Takehiro Yamashita, Toshifumi Yamashita, Teruto Hashiguchi, Ikuro Maruyama, Makoto Shirasawa, Shozo Sonoda, Hiroto Terasaki, Yasushi Sonoda and Hiroki Otsuka. Their work appears in journals such as Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Retina, Experimental Eye Research, Laboratory Investigation and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact