Noah Mark
Impact in
- Music top 2%
- Music History and Culture
-
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Papers in
-
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 6
- Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation 4
- Social Capital and Networks 3
-
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Susan Taylor (2 shared papers)Katerina Dontsova (2 shared papers)Mark L. Brusseau (2 shared papers)Lynn Smith‐Lovin (1 shared paper)Cecilia L. Ridgeway (1 shared paper)Daniel R. Harris (1 shared paper)Reuben J. Thomas (1 shared paper)Jiřı́ Šimůnek (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Sociological Review (6 papers)Social Forces (3 papers)Chemosphere (2 papers)American Journal of Sociology (2 papers)Social Science Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Noah Mark
17 papers receiving 594 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Music 60
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 183
- Communication 69
- Sociology and Political Science 409
- Urban Studies 49
Countries citing papers authored by Noah Mark
This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Mark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Mark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Mark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Mark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Mark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Mark. The network helps show where Noah Mark may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Noah Mark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 134 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 120 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 95 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 65 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 52 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 16 | Culture and competition: A critical test of homophily and distinction explanations for cultural niches | 1998 | 2 |
| 17 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 0 |
About Noah Mark
Noah Mark is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Urban Studies, having authored 18 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Cultural Dynamics (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers), Social Capital and Networks (3 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (2 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (60 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (183 citations), Communication (69 citations), Sociology and Political Science (409 citations) and Urban Studies (49 citations). Noah Mark has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan Taylor, Katerina Dontsova, Mark L. Brusseau, Lynn Smith‐Lovin, Cecilia L. Ridgeway, Daniel R. Harris, Reuben J. Thomas, Jiřı́ Šimůnek, Su Li and Paula England. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Social Forces, Chemosphere, American Journal of Sociology and Social Science Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.