Noah Kent

960 citations
15 papers · 698 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Noah Kent

14 papers receiving 691 citations

Peers

Noah Kent
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Condensed Matter Physics 324
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 223
  • Structural Biology 16
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 351
  • Materials Chemistry 241
Replace Katharina Zeissler with:
Katharina Zeissler United Kingdom
F. Q. Zhu United States
Matthew J. Stolt United States
Rudeesun Songmuang France
S. Allende Chile
Suk Hyun Sung United States
S. Auffret France
Marcus Müller Germany
Renjie Chen United States
Chiming Jin China
Noah Kent relative to Katharina Zeissler United Kingdom Katharina Zeissler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Katharina Zeissler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noah Kent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Kent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Kent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Kent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Kent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Kent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Kent. The network helps show where Noah Kent may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noah Kent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noah Kent Line = papers co-authored together Noah Kent links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2019282
2 2017155
3 2019102
4 201841
5 201738
6 201829
7 201717
8 201916
9 20215
10 20184
11 20243
12 20183
13 20252
14 20251
15 20250

About Noah Kent

Noah Kent is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 698 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (9 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (4 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (4 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (2 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (2 papers) and Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (324 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (223 citations), Structural Biology (16 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (351 citations) and Materials Chemistry (241 citations). Noah Kent has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter Fischer, Robert Streubel, Alejandro Ceballos, F. Hellman, Dong Wang, Shaowei Shi, S. D. Kevan, Xubo Liu, Paul D. Ashby and Yu Chai. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Advanced Materials, Physical review. B., Ultramicroscopy and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact