F. Hellman
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 8
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 5
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 4
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 2
-
- Seismic Waves and Analysis 1
- Journals
- Physical review. D (4 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysics (1 paper)Physical Review Letters (1 paper)MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (1 paper)University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceAustralia
In The Last Decade
F. Hellman
8 papers receiving 1.2k citations
F. Hellman's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.2k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 411
- Oceanography 126
- Geophysics 105
- Ocean Engineering 62
Countries citing papers authored by F. Hellman
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Hellman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Hellman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Hellman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Hellman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Hellman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Hellman. The network helps show where F. Hellman may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 604 |
| 2 | Constraints on Cosmic Strings Using Data from the Third Advanced LIGO–Virgo Observing Run Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 149 |
| 3 | Properties and Astrophysical Implications of the 150 M Binary Black Hole Merger GW190521 | 2020 | 134 |
| 4 | 2021 | 89 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 86 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 70 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 39 |
About F. Hellman
F. Hellman is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics, Oceanography, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (8 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (5 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper), Seismic Waves and Analysis (1 paper), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (1 paper) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.2k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (411 citations), Oceanography (126 citations), Geophysics (105 citations) and Ocean Engineering (62 citations). F. Hellman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Australia. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Physical Review Letters, MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) and University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.