Noah Carl

828 citations
41 papers · 492 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Noah Carl

39 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Noah Carl
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • General Psychology 9
  • Sociology and Political Science 299
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 78
  • Political Science and International Relations 120
  • Social Psychology 95
Replace José L. Duarte with:
José L. Duarte United States
Shannon Christine Houck United States
Candice Marie Jenkins United States
Anna Grimshaw United Kingdom
Sor‐hoon Tan Singapore
Nobuo K. Shimahara United States
Gérard Lemaine France
James Fieser United States
Robert M. Levine United States
Maurice J. Meilleur United States
Noah Carl relative to José L. Duarte United States José L. Duarte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
José L. Duarte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noah Carl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Carl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Carl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Carl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Carl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Carl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Carl. The network helps show where Noah Carl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noah Carl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noah Carl Line = papers co-authored together Noah Carl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201859
2 201457
3 201453
4 201747
5 201630
6 201528
7 201522
8 201517
9 201813
10 201512
11 201912
12 201812
13 201811
14 201411
15 201410
16 20169
17 20189
18 20188
19 20178
20 20197

About Noah Carl

Noah Carl is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Demography, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (8 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (7 papers), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (6 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (9 citations), Sociology and Political Science (299 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (78 citations), Political Science and International Relations (120 citations) and Social Psychology (95 citations). Noah Carl has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nathan Cofnas, Francesco Candeloro Billari, Michael A. Woodley of Menie, James Dennison, Geoffrey Evans, Heiner Rindermann, Lindsay Richards, Anthony Heath, Paul Irwing and Richard Lynn. Their work appears in journals such as Intelligence, Electoral Studies, The American Sociologist, Personality and Individual Differences and The Political Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact