N.J. Schofield

1.5k citations
32 papers · 1.3k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

N.J. Schofield

32 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

N.J. Schofield
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Water Science and Technology 706
  • Soil Science 322
  • Global and Planetary Change 582
  • Environmental Engineering 363
  • Forestry 81
Replace Tom Hatton with:
Tom Hatton Australia
Jorge Marcos de Moraes Brazil
R. B. Salama Australia
Alphonce C. Guzha Germany
Fernanda Valente Portugal
Geoff Hodgson Australia
Mike Bonell United Kingdom
L.A. Bruijnzeel Netherlands
Cuan Petheram Australia
R. de O. Figueiredo Brazil
N.J. Schofield relative to Tom Hatton Australia Tom Hatton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tom Hatton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.J. Schofield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.J. Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.J. Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.J. Schofield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.J. Schofield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.J. Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.J. Schofield. The network helps show where N.J. Schofield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside N.J. Schofield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.J. Schofield Line = papers co-authored together N.J. Schofield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984411
2 1989100
3 199283
4 199274
5 199165
6 198951
7 199046
8 199244
9 198739
10 198936
11 198934
12 199133
13 199029
14 199127
15 199125
16
National Wetlands R&D Program: Scoping Review
199722
17 199121
18 199016
19 199015
20 200113

About N.J. Schofield

N.J. Schofield is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Water Science and Technology, Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Chemistry and Soil Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (13 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (10 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (8 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (7 papers), Groundwater and Watershed Analysis (7 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (4 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers) and Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (706 citations), Soil Science (322 citations), Global and Planetary Change (582 citations), Environmental Engineering (363 citations) and Forestry (81 citations). N.J. Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include John Ruprecht, Keith Beven, M. J. Kirkby, MA Bari, G.L. Stoneman, Ian Loh, R.W. Bell, R.J. Lukatelich, A.J. McComb and Mohammed Abdul Bari. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hydrology, Hydrological Processes, Water Science & Technology, Agroforestry Systems and Forest Ecology and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact