Ning Zhou

1.3k citations
46 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Ning Zhou

44 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Ning Zhou
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Sensory Systems 375
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 903
  • Speech and Hearing 240
  • Signal Processing 218
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
Replace Soha N. Garadat with:
Soha N. Garadat Jordan
Louise Loiselle United States
David M. Landsberger United States
Lendra Friesen Canada
Andrew E. Vandali Australia
Alan Kan United States
Sridhar Kalluri United States
Mary W. Lowder United States
Peter Nopp Austria
Ruth M. Reeder United States
Ning Zhou relative to Soha N. Garadat Jordan Soha N. Garadat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Soha N. Garadat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ning Zhou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ning Zhou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ning Zhou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ning Zhou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ning Zhou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ning Zhou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ning Zhou. The network helps show where Ning Zhou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ning Zhou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ning Zhou Line = papers co-authored together Ning Zhou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014111
2 200974
3 201372
4 201070
5 200760
6 201753
7 201049
8 201147
9 200937
10 201237
11 201336
12 200834
13 201432
14 201231
15 201530
16 201626
17 201224
18 201022
19 201618
20 200818

About Ning Zhou

Ning Zhou is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Signal Processing, Speech and Hearing and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (36 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (23 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (14 papers), Noise Effects and Management (10 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (2 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (1 paper) and Indian and Buddhist Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (375 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (903 citations), Speech and Hearing (240 citations), Signal Processing (218 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations). Ning Zhou has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Li Xu, Bryan E. Pfingst, Deborah J. Colesa, Wuqing Wang, Lixue Dong, Xiaoyan Zhao, Yongxin Li, Juan Huang, Soha N. Garadat and Yehoash Raphael. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Hearing Research, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, PLoS ONE and Ear and Hearing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact