Nina E. Lerman

408 citations
15 papers · 225 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nina E. Lerman

14 papers receiving 158 citations

Peers

Nina E. Lerman
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • History and Philosophy of Science 37
  • Public Administration 14
  • Museology 13
  • Gender Studies 33
  • Human-Computer Interaction 16
Replace Jon Roffe with:
Jon Roffe Australia
Joseph J. Corn United States
Stephen H. Norwood United States
Edwin Black United States
Werner Rammert Germany
Laura J. Miller United States
Regina Lee Blaszczyk United States
Susan Smulyan United States
Athina Karatzogianni United Kingdom
Richard Biernacki United States
Nina E. Lerman relative to Jon Roffe Australia Jon Roffe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Jon Roffe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina E. Lerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina E. Lerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina E. Lerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina E. Lerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina E. Lerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina E. Lerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina E. Lerman. The network helps show where Nina E. Lerman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Nina E. Lerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina E. Lerman Line = papers co-authored together Nina E. Lerman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
Gender and Technology: a Reader
200359
2 198838
3 200327
4 199720
5
Gender & technology : a reader
200313
6 198913
7 201012
8 199712
9 199712
10 19976
11 19975
12 19973
13
From "useful knowledge" to "habits of industry": Gender, race, and class in nineteenth-century technical education
19933
14 19972
15 19980

About Nina E. Lerman

Nina E. Lerman is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Museology, Marketing and Computer Science Applications, having authored 15 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American History and Culture (2 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (2 papers), History of Computing Technologies (2 papers), Asian Studies and History (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (1 paper), American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper) and Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations), Public Administration (14 citations), Museology (13 citations), Gender Studies (33 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (16 citations). Nina E. Lerman has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Arwen Mohun, Ruth Oldenziel, Louise A. Tilly, Heidi Hartmann, Robert E. Kraut, Paul A. Gilje and Robert Asher. Their work appears in journals such as Technology and Culture, Osiris, The Oral History Review, Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact