Nina E. Fultz
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
-
- Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Papers in
-
- Sleep and Wakefulness Research 4
- Neural dynamics and brain function 3
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 3
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 2
-
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications 3
- Co-authors
- Laura D. Lewis (8 shared papers)Jon̈athan R. Polimeni (6 shared papers)Bruce R. Rosen (4 shared papers)Giorgio Bonmassar (5 shared papers)Kawin Setsompop (3 shared papers)Robert Stickgold (2 shared papers)Qiyuan Tian (2 shared papers)Ned A. Ohringer (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- NeuroImage (2 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)PLoS Biology (1 paper)Biological Psychiatry (1 paper)Journal of Neural Engineering (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyAustria
In The Last Decade
Nina E. Fultz
9 papers receiving 932 citations
Nina E. Fultz's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 152
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 390
- Cognitive Neuroscience 389
- Neurology 147
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 114
Countries citing papers authored by Nina E. Fultz
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina E. Fultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina E. Fultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina E. Fultz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina E. Fultz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina E. Fultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina E. Fultz. The network helps show where Nina E. Fultz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina E. Fultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coupled electrophysiological, hemodynamic, and cerebrospinal fluid oscillations in human sleep Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 730 |
| 2 | 2020 | 98 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 1 |
About Nina E. Fultz
Nina E. Fultz is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 943 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (152 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (390 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (389 citations), Neurology (147 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (114 citations). Nina E. Fultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Laura D. Lewis, Jon̈athan R. Polimeni, Bruce R. Rosen, Giorgio Bonmassar, Kawin Setsompop, Robert Stickgold, Qiyuan Tian, Ned A. Ohringer, Jingyuan E. Chen and Catie Chang. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Nature Communications, PLoS Biology, Biological Psychiatry and Journal of Neural Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.