Nikolai Ermakov

3.2k citations
48 papers · 753 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Nikolai Ermakov

43 papers receiving 711 citations

Peers

Nikolai Ermakov
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 227
  • Ecological Modeling 65
  • Atmospheric Science 265
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 283
  • Plant Science 321
Replace Svatava Kubešová with:
Svatava Kubešová Czechia
Milan Valachovič Slovakia
Martin Kočí Czechia
Pavel Lustyk Czechia
Asbjørn Moen Norway
Soraia Girardi Bauermann Brazil
Chad R. Zirbel United States
Eva Jamrichová Czechia
Frédéric Guibal France
David F. Murray United States
Nikolai Ermakov relative to Svatava Kubešová Czechia Svatava Kubešová's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Svatava Kubešová · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nikolai Ermakov

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nikolai Ermakov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikolai Ermakov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikolai Ermakov more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nikolai Ermakov

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikolai Ermakov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikolai Ermakov. The network helps show where Nikolai Ermakov may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nikolai Ermakov, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nikolai Ermakov Line = papers co-authored together Nikolai Ermakov links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007106
2 200776
3 201072
4 201555
5 201654
6 201851
7 200237
8 201533
9 201232
10 200832
11 200621
12 200920
13 201119
14 199917
15 201717
16 201616
17 200014
18 199810
19 20118
20 20087

About Nikolai Ermakov

Nikolai Ermakov is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Atmospheric Science, Soil Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 48 papers that have together received 753 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (37 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (33 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (19 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (8 papers), Soil and Environmental Studies (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (5 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (227 citations), Ecological Modeling (65 citations), Atmospheric Science (265 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (283 citations) and Plant Science (321 citations). Nikolai Ermakov has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, Czechia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Milan Chytrý, Milan Valachovič, Martin Kočí, Petra Hájková, Jiří Danihelka, Michal Hájek, Pavel Lustyk, Svatava Kubešová, Zdenka Otýpková and Michal Horsák. Their work appears in journals such as Folia Geobotanica, Boreas, Journal of Vegetation Science, Applied Vegetation Science and Biodiversity and Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact