Nikola Stenzel

1.2k citations
36 papers · 544 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Nikola Stenzel

32 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

Nikola Stenzel
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Applied Psychology 36
  • Clinical Psychology 113
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 76
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 128
  • General Health Professions 78
Replace Ching‐Hui Chien with:
Ching‐Hui Chien Taiwan
Rie Lambæk Mikkelsen Denmark
Charlotte Garrett United Kingdom
Veronica Chan China
Megan M. Hosey United States
Thomas F. Northrup United States
Jay E. Earles United States
Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard Denmark
Lisetta Lovett United Kingdom
Emmanuel Wiernik France
Nikola Stenzel relative to Ching‐Hui Chien Taiwan Ching‐Hui Chien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Ching‐Hui Chien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nikola Stenzel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nikola Stenzel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikola Stenzel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikola Stenzel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nikola Stenzel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikola Stenzel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikola Stenzel. The network helps show where Nikola Stenzel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nikola Stenzel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nikola Stenzel Line = papers co-authored together Nikola Stenzel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200962
2 201349
3 201245
4 201540
5 201439
6 201632
7 201732
8 201832
9 202131
10 201630
11 201528
12 201919
13 201017
14 201616
15 202115
16 20219
17 20158
18 20225
19 20125
20 20125

About Nikola Stenzel

Nikola Stenzel is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Neurology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (10 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (6 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (6 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (4 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (36 citations), Clinical Psychology (113 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (76 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (128 citations) and General Health Professions (78 citations). Nikola Stenzel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Winfried Rief, Klaus Kenn, Ricarda Mewes, Johannes A. C. Laferton, Elmar Brähler, Susanne Fischer, Alexandra Martin, Heide Glaesmer, Stefan Krumm and Wolfgang Schürmann. Their work appears in journals such as Chronic Respiratory Disease, Psychology and Health, Frontiers in Psychiatry, ERJ Open Research and Annals of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact