Daniela Leitl

636 citations
33 papers · 200 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Leitl

28 papers receiving 188 citations

Peers

Daniela Leitl
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 29
  • Neurology 62
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 117
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 29
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 8
Replace Emily Hume with:
Emily Hume United Kingdom
R Glöckl Germany
Juan José González-Gerez Spain
Motaz Alawna Türkiye
Giulia Innocenti Bruni Italy
A M Pekacka-Egli Germany
Enya Daynes United Kingdom
Nikki Gardiner United Kingdom
Kris Ides Belgium
Gersiel Nascimento de Oliveira Júnior Brazil
Daniela Leitl relative to Emily Hume United Kingdom Emily Hume's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Emily Hume · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Leitl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Leitl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Leitl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Leitl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Leitl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Leitl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Leitl. The network helps show where Daniela Leitl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Leitl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Leitl Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Leitl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202241
2 202421
3 202216
4 202115
5 202314
6 202114
7 202114
8 20219
9 20218
10 20236
11 20216
12 20185
13 20244
14 20174
15 20204
16 20202
17 20212
18 20222
19 20212
20 20212

About Daniela Leitl

Daniela Leitl is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 33 papers that have together received 200 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (17 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (14 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (12 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (5 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (5 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (29 citations), Neurology (62 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (117 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (29 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (8 citations). Daniela Leitl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tessa Schneeberger, Andreas Rembert Koczulla, Inga Jarosch, Rainer Gloeckl, Klaus Kenn, Ralf Harun Zwick, Christoph Nell, Wolfgang Hitzl, Marc Spielmanns and Wolfram Windisch. Their work appears in journals such as Respiration, Thorax, ERJ Open Research, BMJ Open Respiratory Research and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact