Nigel Mercer
Impact in
- Dermatology top 2%
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research
- Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
- Genetics top 5%
- Cleft Lip and Palate Research
- Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Karen Sohan (2 shared papers)Phillipa M. Kyle (2 shared papers)Peter Soothill (2 shared papers)John Kenealy (2 shared papers)Michael J. Stein (2 shared papers)Claudia Malic (2 shared papers)Andrew Wilson (1 shared paper)Philip MacCarthy (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (5 papers)Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (4 papers)Anaesthesia (3 papers)Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (3 papers)Burns (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Nigel Mercer
45 papers receiving 896 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Dermatology 152
- Genetics 362
- Rehabilitation 45
- Surgery 220
- Oncology 122
Countries citing papers authored by Nigel Mercer
This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Mercer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel Mercer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Mercer. The network helps show where Nigel Mercer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nigel Mercer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 107 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 41 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 31 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 21 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 18 |
About Nigel Mercer
Nigel Mercer is a scholar working on Genetics, Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Dermatology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 940 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cleft Lip and Palate Research (17 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (6 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (4 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers) and Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (152 citations), Genetics (362 citations), Rehabilitation (45 citations), Surgery (220 citations) and Oncology (122 citations). Nigel Mercer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Karen Sohan, Phillipa M. Kyle, Peter Soothill, John Kenealy, Michael J. Stein, Claudia Malic, Andrew Wilson, Philip MacCarthy, Tim Cook and Tim Goodacre. Their work appears in journals such as The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Anaesthesia, Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery and Burns.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.