John Kenealy
Impact in
- Dermatology top 5%
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research
- Oncology top 10%
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Cancer survivorship and care
Papers in
-
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research 8
- Oncology 8
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management 8
- Co-authors
- Diana M. Harcourt (2 shared papers)Paul R. Maddox (1 shared paper)N. Ambler (1 shared paper)Simon Cawthorn (1 shared paper)H C Umpleby (1 shared paper)Richard Rainsbury (1 shared paper)Clive D. Reid (1 shared paper)Nichola Rumsey (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (5 papers)Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (3 papers)Lasers in Surgery and Medicine (2 papers)Burns (1 paper)ANZ Journal of Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
John Kenealy
26 papers receiving 631 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Dermatology 120
- Oncology 230
- Surgery 302
- General Dentistry 1
- Cultural Studies 21
Countries citing papers authored by John Kenealy
This map shows the geographic impact of John Kenealy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Kenealy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Kenealy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Kenealy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Kenealy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Kenealy. The network helps show where John Kenealy may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Kenealy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 248 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 31 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 27 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 5 |
About John Kenealy
John Kenealy is a scholar working on Dermatology, Oncology, Surgery, Cultural Studies and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dermatologic Treatments and Research (8 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (8 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers), Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (2 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (2 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (1 paper), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (1 paper) and Thermal Regulation in Medicine (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (120 citations), Oncology (230 citations), Surgery (302 citations), General Dentistry (1 citation) and Cultural Studies (21 citations). John Kenealy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Diana M. Harcourt, Paul R. Maddox, N. Ambler, Simon Cawthorn, H C Umpleby, Richard Rainsbury, Clive D. Reid, Nichola Rumsey, Nigel S G Mercer and H Rigby. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Burns and ANZ Journal of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.