John Kenealy
Impact in
- Dermatology top 2%
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research
- Oncology top 10%
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Cancer survivorship and care
Papers in
-
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research 8
- Oncology 9
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management 8
- Co-authors
- Diana Harcourt (2 shared papers)Clive D. Reid (1 shared paper)Richard Rainsbury (1 shared paper)N. Ambler (1 shared paper)Paul R. Maddox (1 shared paper)H C Umpleby (1 shared paper)Nichola Rumsey (1 shared paper)Simon Cawthorn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (3 papers)Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (3 papers)Lasers in Surgery and Medicine (2 papers)International Journal of Cancer (1 paper)Burns (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
John Kenealy
24 papers receiving 613 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Dermatology 158
- Oncology 222
- Surgery 256
- Biophysics 19
- Cancer Research 41
Countries citing papers authored by John Kenealy
This map shows the geographic impact of John Kenealy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Kenealy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Kenealy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Kenealy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Kenealy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Kenealy. The network helps show where John Kenealy may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Kenealy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 248 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 25 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 18 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 4 |
About John Kenealy
John Kenealy is a scholar working on Dermatology, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (8 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (8 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (5 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (4 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (3 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (2 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (158 citations), Oncology (222 citations), Surgery (256 citations), Biophysics (19 citations) and Cancer Research (41 citations). John Kenealy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Diana Harcourt, Clive D. Reid, Richard Rainsbury, N. Ambler, Paul R. Maddox, H C Umpleby, Nichola Rumsey, Simon Cawthorn, Nigel Mercer and Nick J. Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, International Journal of Cancer and Burns.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.