Nigel Hymas

944 citations
13 papers · 743 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nigel Hymas

13 papers receiving 680 citations

Peers

Nigel Hymas
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Clinical Psychology 422
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 269
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 218
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 117
  • Medical Terminology 2
Replace Ina Alterman with:
Ina Alterman United States
Massimo Abbruzzese Italy
P Stoessel United States
Marilyn Stevens United Kingdom
Angela Eastvold United States
Peter A. Bick United States
Sarit Faragian Israel
Ileana Berman United States
Bijan Bastani United States
D.H. Linszen Netherlands
Nigel Hymas relative to Ina Alterman United States Ina Alterman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ina Alterman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nigel Hymas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Hymas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Hymas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Hymas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel Hymas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Hymas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Hymas. The network helps show where Nigel Hymas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Nigel Hymas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nigel Hymas Line = papers co-authored together Nigel Hymas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1989183
2 1995158
3 1991114
4 1991113
5 198949
6 198737
7 200426
8 199126
9 199323
10
Sporadic facial stereotypies in patients with schizophrenia and compulsive disorders.
19886
11 19875
12 19982
13 19931

About Nigel Hymas

Nigel Hymas is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (422 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (269 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (218 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (117 citations) and Medical Terminology (2 citations). Nigel Hymas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Derek Bolton, Denise Head, Andrew J. Lees, G. V. Sawle, R. S. J. Frackowiak, Raymond Levy, Eric Chen, Tom Dening, Peter J. McKenna and Germán E. Berríos. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, The British Journal of Psychiatry, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, CNS Spectrums and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact