Nicolas Gerst

26 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

Nicolas Gerst
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Biochemistry 64
  • Pharmacology 60
  • Molecular Biology 320
  • Biochemistry 24
  • Surgery 167
Replace Jihai Pang with:
Jihai Pang United States
George Popják United States
Chester E. Holmlund United States
Marjorie C. Lindberg United States
Erwin Schwenk United States
Shigeyuki Takeyama Japan
Tina M. Hallis United States
Ramanujam Rajagopalan India
Kajsa Norbeck Sweden
James H. Dyer United States
Nicolas Gerst relative to Jihai Pang United States Jihai Pang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jihai Pang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Gerst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Gerst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Gerst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Gerst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Gerst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Gerst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Gerst. The network helps show where Nicolas Gerst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicolas Gerst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicolas Gerst Line = papers co-authored together Nicolas Gerst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198765
2 199756
3 200138
4 201234
5 199732
6 199631
7 199326
8 198822
9 201122
10 198621
11 201317
12 198816
13 199414
14 199513
15 199412
16 198810
17 20138
18 19947
19 20147
20 19947

About Nicolas Gerst

Nicolas Gerst is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Oncology, Pharmacology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 26 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (13 papers), Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry (8 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (7 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (6 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (3 papers) and Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (64 citations), Pharmacology (60 citations), Molecular Biology (320 citations), Biochemistry (24 citations) and Surgery (167 citations). Nicolas Gerst has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include George J. Schroepfer, William K. Wilson, Benfang Helen Ruan, Francis Schuber, Luigi Cattel, Kouichi Tamura, Jeffrey N. Masters, Franca Viola, Shankar Swaminathan and Justin Shey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Lipid Research, Chemistry and Physics of Lipids, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics and Biochemical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact