Nicolas Dendoncker

5.0k citations
77 papers · 2.7k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Nicolas Dendoncker

75 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Nicolas Dendoncker
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Ecological Modeling 460
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.4k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 473
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 223
  • Ecology 625
Replace David Hole with:
David Hole United States
Stefan Schindler Austria
Thomas Wrbka Austria
Ilse R. Geijzendorffer France
Evan Girvetz United States
Ângela Lomba Portugal
Laetitia M. Navarro Germany
Jacqueline Loos Germany
Anna F. Cord Germany
Andrés Etter Colombia
Nicolas Dendoncker relative to David Hole United States David Hole's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David Hole · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Dendoncker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Dendoncker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Dendoncker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Dendoncker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Dendoncker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Dendoncker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Dendoncker. The network helps show where Nicolas Dendoncker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicolas Dendoncker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicolas Dendoncker Line = papers co-authored together Nicolas Dendoncker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006410
2 2018132
3 2009117
4 2019107
5 201389
6 200688
7 201186
8 201784
9 201381
10 201679
11 202073
12 201469
13 201862
14 201561
15 200854
16 200450
17 202049
18 201947
19 200644
20 202044

About Nicolas Dendoncker

Nicolas Dendoncker is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 77 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (31 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (17 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (11 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Forest Management and Policy (8 papers) and Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (460 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (473 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (223 citations) and Ecology (625 citations). Nicolas Dendoncker has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Rounsevell, Marc Dufrêne, Cécile Barnaud, Sander Jacobs, Claude Schmit, Patrick Bogaert, Isabelle Reginster, Rik De Vreese, Clélia Sirami and Pete Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Ecosystem Services, Journal of Land Use Science, Ecology and Society, Journal of Environmental Management and Global Change Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact