Nick Fenby
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Papers in
-
- Plant Virus Research Studies 3
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies 2
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 2
- Plant Disease Management Techniques 1
-
- Plant Reproductive Biology 3
- Co-authors
- Rod J. Scott (1 shared paper)Melissa Spielman (1 shared paper)Sally Adams (1 shared paper)Rod Scott (2 shared papers)François Guérineau (1 shared paper)Gary D. Foster (2 shared papers)Nigel W. Scott (1 shared paper)R. W. Gibson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Plant Biotechnology Journal (1 paper)Development (1 paper)Molecular Biotechnology (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)Sexual Plant Reproduction (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nick Fenby
6 papers receiving 533 citations
Nick Fenby's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Plant Science 508
- Horticulture 5
- Molecular Biology 323
- Biochemistry 22
- Endocrinology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Nick Fenby
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Fenby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Fenby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Fenby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Fenby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Fenby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Fenby. The network helps show where Nick Fenby may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Nick Fenby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 gene of Arabidopsis links auxin signalling, cell division, and the size of seeds and other organs Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 504 |
| 2 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 3 | Partial sequence of HSP70 homologue gene shows diversity between West African and East African isolates of sweetpotato chlorotic stunt virus. | 2002 | 10 |
| 4 | PCR and non-isotopic labeling techniques for plant virus detection. | 1995 | 8 |
| 5 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 2 |
About Nick Fenby
Nick Fenby is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Endocrinology and Immunology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (3 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (2 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (1 paper), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (1 paper), Plant Disease Management Techniques (1 paper) and Transgenic Plants and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (508 citations), Horticulture (5 citations), Molecular Biology (323 citations), Biochemistry (22 citations) and Endocrinology (13 citations). Nick Fenby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rod J. Scott, Melissa Spielman, Sally Adams, Rod Scott, François Guérineau, Gary D. Foster, Nigel W. Scott, R. W. Gibson, Susan Seal and Roger I. Pennell. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Biotechnology Journal, Development, Molecular Biotechnology, PubMed and Sexual Plant Reproduction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.