Nick Carter

40 papers receiving 670 citations

Peers

Nick Carter
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Occupational Therapy 32
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 84
  • Ecology 129
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 45
  • Ecological Modeling 19
Replace Kaoru Saito with:
Kaoru Saito Japan
Erwin R. Schmidt Germany
Norman Maclean United Kingdom
Piero Cervella Italy
Heather Campbell United States
James J. Robinson United Kingdom
Andrew Hinton United States
Peter Schumacher Switzerland
Emily Jane Davis United States
David L. Hurley United States
Nick Carter relative to Kaoru Saito Japan Kaoru Saito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kaoru Saito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Carter. The network helps show where Nick Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Carter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Carter Line = papers co-authored together Nick Carter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992146
2 2002145
3 200061
4 201655
5 200349
6 199439
7 199435
8 199722
9
See How We Grow: A Report on the Status of Parenting Education in the U.S.
199621
10 199719
11 199617
12 201715
13 201013
14 20139
15 20129
16 20199
17 19949
18
Modern Italy in Historical Perspective
20108
19 20198
20 20156

About Nick Carter

Nick Carter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 742 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (8 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (8 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (4 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), European Political History Analysis (2 papers) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (32 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (84 citations), Ecology (129 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (45 citations) and Ecological Modeling (19 citations). Nick Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Juliet A. Vickery, Robert J. Fuller, Gareth J. Thomas, Richard E. Tashian, David Hewett‐Emmett, Nils Bergenhem, Simon Martin, Dorothea Bedigian, Lauren E. Kahn and David Bainbridge. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, Modern Italy, Journal of Contemporary History, The Historical Journal and The American Journal of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact