Nicholas Xenos

620 citations
22 papers · 271 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Xenos

17 papers receiving 217 citations

Peers

Nicholas Xenos
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Political Science and International Relations 84
  • Sociology and Political Science 140
  • Anthropology 30
  • History 19
  • Museology 6
Replace R. J. Crampton with:
R. J. Crampton United Kingdom
Richard White United Kingdom
Bipan Chandra India
Peter Hopkirk
J. Victor Koschmann United States
Edmund Burke United States
JA Squires United States
Ulf Brunnbauer Germany
John Hirst Australia
Achim von Oppen Germany
Nicholas Xenos relative to R. J. Crampton United Kingdom R. J. Crampton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
R. J. Crampton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Xenos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Xenos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Xenos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Xenos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Xenos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Xenos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Xenos. The network helps show where Nicholas Xenos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Xenos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Xenos Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Xenos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197548
2 199644
3
Bodies of meaning: Studies on language, labor, and liberation.
200239
4 198736
5 197634
6 199324
7 201723
8 20176
9 20015
10 20172
11 19882
12 19892
13 19982
14
POLITICAL-THEORY AND THE LANGUAGE OF POLITICS
19881
15 20031
16 20151
17 19921
18 20070
19 20080
20 19890

About Nicholas Xenos

Nicholas Xenos is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Philosophy and Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Political History Analysis (2 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper) and Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (84 citations), Sociology and Political Science (140 citations), Anthropology (30 citations), History (19 citations) and Museology (6 citations). Nicholas Xenos has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joan C. Tronto and Antonio Y. Vázquez‐Arroyo. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Review, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, Ethics & International Affairs, History of European Ideas and Alternatives Global Local Political.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact